About this site

  • Comments
    When you submit a comment, it won't be published until approved. This is to cut down on comment spam. However, I will also edit or block comments that are profane or offensive.
  • No Legal Advice
    Although I may from time to time discuss legal issues on this blog, nothing that I post should be construed as legal advice, nor as creating an attorney-client relationship between you and me. In fact, there's a good chance I'm not licensed to practice law wherever you are. If you need legal advice, you should consult an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
  • Personal View
    This blog is neither affiliated with my employer nor hosted by it. It is maintained through TypePad, and I pay the hosting fees. Nothing that is posted here should be construed as anything other than the views of the particular author of the post.
  • Tung Yin's Recent Papers (SSRN)

April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Stats


  • Check Google Page Rank

« Another view from the ground in Iraq | Main | Scowcroft on the Terrorist "Nuisance" »

October 12, 2004

Comments

Dylan

The focus on low level terrorism somewhat misses the point - the invasion of Iraq was (largely) premised on the belief that the greatest threat to the US is terrorists with WMD, and that WMD are most likely to fall into the hands of terrorists through aid by rogue states. One terrorist with WMD is worse than a thousand with guns or bombs.

Now in hindsight Iraq didn't have WMD, so its invasion may have no impact on this calculus. But the risks to American lives in the US aren't hugely enhanced by even a very large increase in non-English speaking jihadis with AK-47s.

The comments to this entry are closed.