About this site

  • Comments
    When you submit a comment, it won't be published until approved. This is to cut down on comment spam. However, I will also edit or block comments that are profane or offensive.
  • No Legal Advice
    Although I may from time to time discuss legal issues on this blog, nothing that I post should be construed as legal advice, nor as creating an attorney-client relationship between you and me. In fact, there's a good chance I'm not licensed to practice law wherever you are. If you need legal advice, you should consult an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
  • Personal View
    This blog is neither affiliated with my employer nor hosted by it. It is maintained through TypePad, and I pay the hosting fees. Nothing that is posted here should be construed as anything other than the views of the particular author of the post.
  • Tung Yin's Recent Papers (SSRN)

April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      


  • Check Google Page Rank

« Monster Moon Race recap | Main | The iPhone 4S and that "Talking Tina" episode of "The Twilight Zone" »

November 01, 2012



I think that if the measure is likely to fail, then it would've been the better choice to vote for it in order to send a message that you are generally pro-decriminalization, even with the reservations you have about the specifics of the measure.

Tung Yin

I don't think that message is necessary. Pot's been more or less decriminalized at the state level here in Oregon. Besides, Washington state has a more narrow legalization measure that may well pass -- that's probably a more useful message.

The comments to this entry are closed.