May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

About this site

  • Comments
    When you submit a comment, it won't be published until approved. This is to cut down on comment spam. However, I will also edit or block comments that are profane or offensive.
  • E-mail
    Feel free to e-mail me at tung-yin(at)uiowa(dot)edu.
  • No Legal Advice
    Although I may from time to time discuss legal issues on this blog, nothing that I post should be construed as legal advice, nor as creating an attorney-client relationship between you and me. In fact, there's a good chance I'm not licensed to practice law wherever you are. If you need legal advice, you should consult an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
  • Personal View
    This blog is neither affiliated with my employer nor hosted by it. It is maintained through TypePad, and I pay the hosting fees. Nothing that is posted here should be construed as anything other than the views of the particular author of the post.
  • Tung Yin's Recent Papers (SSRN)

Polls

Recent Comments

Photo Albums

Blog powered by TypePad

Iowa City Weather

  • The WeatherPixie

« Firing U.S. Attorneys | Main | Jeffrey Rosen's "The Supreme Court" »

March 16, 2007

Geek alert -- who would win between Battlestar Galactica and the U.S.S. Enterprise?

There's actually a TV show thread devoted to this, inspired by a comment by shock-jock Howard Stern.

Of course, we have to get straight, are we talking about BSG (original) or BSG (new)?  And which Enterprise?

The way I see it, the Capt. Kirk version of the Enterprise beats either of the BSGs, because, after all, it's Capt. Kirk!  I mean, he beat the no-win Kobayashi Maru scenario . . .

On the other hand, the Capt. Harriman version of the Enterprise (from "Star Trek: Generation," aka Cameron in "Ferris Bueller's Day Off") would lose to either BSG without Capt. Kirk there to tell him what to do.

I'm skeptical of what Capt. Picard would do, perhaps attempt to resolve things peacefully, not realizing that the omnipotent force staging this fight has no interest in negotiations.  Adm. Adama (the Edward James Olmos version) would probably get Picard to lower his shields and then fire off a couple of nukes at the Enterprise.  Cmdr. Adama (the Lorne Green version) might actually try to negotiate as well, so that would end with both ships destroyed out of spite by the omnipotent force.

In all seriousness -- well, as much as this topic could possibly engender -- it seems to me that the thread commenters who side with the Enterprise are correct.  Starfleet ships have transporters, and Galactica doesn't seem to have any shields that would stop the transporters from working.  Just beam a tactical nuke into CIC and that's pretty much all she wrote. . . .

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/20973/16981230

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Geek alert -- who would win between Battlestar Galactica and the U.S.S. Enterprise?:

Comments

My favorite thing is that you're a law professor (soon to be tenured! hooray!) on top of all this. I don't think many of my professors even watch TV, much less geek TV.

Nah, because Capt. Picard turns out to be a Cylon in the end, but one of the good ones, so he helps Galactica wipe out the entire Cylon fleet with a few well-placed photon torpedoes. It's a plot twist worthy of BSG.

Personally, I've always wondered who would win in a battle between Captain Picard and Darth Vader. As it turns out, someone has actually explored this question:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNxhrPaaCA4

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In