About this site

  • Comments
    When you submit a comment, it won't be published until approved. This is to cut down on comment spam. However, I will also edit or block comments that are profane or offensive.
  • No Legal Advice
    Although I may from time to time discuss legal issues on this blog, nothing that I post should be construed as legal advice, nor as creating an attorney-client relationship between you and me. In fact, there's a good chance I'm not licensed to practice law wherever you are. If you need legal advice, you should consult an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
  • Personal View
    This blog is neither affiliated with my employer nor hosted by it. It is maintained through TypePad, and I pay the hosting fees. Nothing that is posted here should be construed as anything other than the views of the particular author of the post.
  • Tung Yin's Recent Papers (SSRN)

April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      


  • Check Google Page Rank

« I know I'm not a dance critic but . . . . | Main | Is (was) Eliot Spitzer a necessary evil, or just evil? »

August 14, 2006



Gabrielle was s-o-o-o-o hot that the name simply wouldn't be appropriate for a planet whose daytime highs are near absolute zero.

John Neff

The real issue is what is the difference between a major and minor planet. From a scientific point of view it is a nomenclature issue and I am surprised the IAU has agreed to consider it.

The NYT seems to think that it is a big deal to be able to classify Pluto as either a major or minor planet. If we come up with contrived classification scheme to do so it will add zero to the sum of scientific knowledge.

Dan Gulya

Your worst fears are already realized:


I just saw a diagram in today's paper & guess what? Xena has a moon.... And it's named Gabrielle. I'm guessing there's some astronomer out there with a wicked sense of humor.

The comments to this entry are closed.